Files
openwrt-R7800-nss/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-6.6/950-0661-gpio-brcmstb-Use-dynamic-GPIO-base-numbers.patch
John Audia 667b131ad1 kernel: bump 6.6 to 6.6.76
Changelog: https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.76

Manually rebased:
	bcm27xx/patches-6.6/950-0519-usb-dwc3-Set-DMA-and-coherent-masks-early.patch
	imx/patches-6.6/600-PCI-imx6-Start-link-at-max-gen-first-for-IMX8MM-and-IMX8MP.patch

Removed upstreamed:
	bcm27xx/patches-6.6/950-1446-media-i2c-ov9282-Correct-the-exposure-offset.patch[1]
	bcm47xx/patches-6.6/701-bgmac-reduce-max-frame-size-to-support-just-MTU-1500.patch[2]
	bcm53xx/patches-6.6/700-bgmac-reduce-max-frame-size-to-support-just-MTU-1500.patch[3]
	ramips/patches-6.6/003-v6.14-clk-ralink-mtmips-remove-duplicated-xtal-clock-for-Ralink.patch[4]

All other patches automatically rebased.

1. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.6.76&id=11c7649c9ec3dcaf0a7760551ad30747d9e02d81
2, 3. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.6.76&id=5e6e723675e54ced5200bcc367e2526badc4070c
4. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.6.76&id=d0edcd0d18d700d76c61c091a24568b8b8c3b387

Build system: x86/64
Build-tested: bcm27xx/bcm2712, flogic/xiaomi_redmi-router-ax6000-ubootmod, ramips/tplink_archer-a6-v3
Run-tested: bcm27xx/bcm2712, flogic/xiaomi_redmi-router-ax6000-ubootmod, ramips/tplink_archer-a6-v3

Signed-off-by: John Audia <therealgraysky@proton.me>
Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/17822
(cherry picked from commit 84e370f16c)
Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/17987
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
2025-02-25 23:16:17 +01:00

118 lines
3.7 KiB
Diff

From 2c6ef57c11137c07d5961c3dda2021e0403628ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 16:30:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0661/1085] gpio: brcmstb: Use dynamic GPIO base numbers
Forcing a gpiochip to have a fixed base number now leads to a warning
message. Remove the need to do so by calculating hwirq numbers based
on bank numbers.
Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Fixes: 3b0213d56eb7 ("gpio: Add GPIO support for Broadcom STB SoCs")
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_priv {
struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
struct irq_chip irq_chip;
int parent_irq;
- int gpio_base;
int num_gpios;
int parent_wake_irq;
};
@@ -92,7 +91,7 @@ brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcm
static int brcmstb_gpio_hwirq_to_offset(irq_hw_number_t hwirq,
struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank)
{
- return hwirq - (bank->gc.base - bank->parent_priv->gpio_base);
+ return hwirq - bank->id * 32;
}
static void brcmstb_gpio_set_imask(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank,
@@ -117,8 +116,9 @@ static void brcmstb_gpio_set_imask(struc
static int brcmstb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
{
struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(gc);
+ struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
/* gc_offset is relative to this gpio_chip; want real offset */
- int hwirq = offset + (gc->base - priv->gpio_base);
+ int hwirq = offset + bank->id * 32;
if (hwirq >= priv->num_gpios)
return -ENXIO;
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static void brcmstb_gpio_irq_bank_handle
{
struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = bank->parent_priv;
struct irq_domain *domain = priv->irq_domain;
- int hwbase = bank->gc.base - priv->gpio_base;
+ int hwbase = bank->id * 32;
unsigned long status;
while ((status = brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank))) {
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_of_xlate(struct
if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count < gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
return -EINVAL;
- offset = gpiospec->args[0] - (gc->base - priv->gpio_base);
+ offset = gpiospec->args[0] - bank->id * 32;
if (offset >= gc->ngpio || offset < 0)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -596,8 +596,8 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
struct resource *res;
u32 bank_width;
int num_banks = 0;
+ int num_gpios = 0;
int err;
- static int gpio_base;
unsigned long flags = 0;
bool need_wakeup_event = false;
@@ -611,7 +611,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
if (IS_ERR(reg_base))
return PTR_ERR(reg_base);
- priv->gpio_base = gpio_base;
priv->reg_base = reg_base;
priv->pdev = pdev;
@@ -652,7 +651,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
dev_dbg(dev, "Width 0 found: Empty bank @ %d\n",
num_banks);
num_banks++;
- gpio_base += MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
+ num_gpios += MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
continue;
}
@@ -694,7 +693,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
err = -ENOMEM;
goto fail;
}
- gc->base = gpio_base;
+ gc->base = -1;
gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
gc->of_xlate = brcmstb_gpio_of_xlate;
/* not all ngpio lines are valid, will use bank width later */
@@ -718,7 +717,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
bank->id);
goto fail;
}
- gpio_base += gc->ngpio;
+ num_gpios += gc->ngpio;
dev_dbg(dev, "bank=%d, base=%d, ngpio=%d, width=%d\n", bank->id,
gc->base, gc->ngpio, bank->width);
@@ -729,7 +728,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
num_banks++;
}
- priv->num_gpios = gpio_base - priv->gpio_base;
+ priv->num_gpios = num_gpios;
if (priv->parent_irq > 0) {
err = brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(pdev, priv);
if (err)