ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
This commit is contained in:
@@ -85,17 +85,17 @@
|
||||
// The following leds are defined in the ArcOS firmware, but reportedly
|
||||
// not present in the Freestation5 device.
|
||||
wifi {
|
||||
label = "freestation:unknown:wifi";
|
||||
label = "freestation5:unknown:wifi";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio0 7 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
powerg {
|
||||
label = "freestation:unknown:powerg";
|
||||
label = "freestation5:unknown:powerg";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
usb {
|
||||
label = "freestation:unknown:usb";
|
||||
label = "freestation5:unknown:usb";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio0 14 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user