ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs

The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664
This commit is contained in:
John Crispin
2015-08-17 06:24:34 +00:00
parent af60c367b7
commit 1a392636a5
80 changed files with 695 additions and 613 deletions

View File

@@ -85,17 +85,17 @@
// The following leds are defined in the ArcOS firmware, but reportedly
// not present in the Freestation5 device.
wifi {
label = "freestation:unknown:wifi";
label = "freestation5:unknown:wifi";
gpios = <&gpio0 7 1>;
};
powerg {
label = "freestation:unknown:powerg";
label = "freestation5:unknown:powerg";
gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
};
usb {
label = "freestation:unknown:usb";
label = "freestation5:unknown:usb";
gpios = <&gpio0 14 1>;
};
};