ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs

The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664
This commit is contained in:
John Crispin
2015-08-17 06:24:34 +00:00
parent af60c367b7
commit 1a392636a5
80 changed files with 695 additions and 613 deletions

View File

@@ -57,32 +57,32 @@
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power {
label = "hg255d:power";
label = "hg255d:green:power";
gpios = <&gpio0 8 1>;
};
internet {
label = "hg255d:internet";
label = "hg255d:green:internet";
gpios = <&gpio0 13 1>;
};
wifi {
label = "hg255d:wlan";
label = "hg255d:green:wlan";
gpios = <&gpio0 14 1>;
};
usb {
label = "hg255d:usb";
label = "hg255d:green:usb";
gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
};
wps {
label = "hg255d:wps";
label = "hg255d:green:wps";
gpios = <&gpio0 12 1>;
};
voice {
label = "hg255d:voice";
label = "hg255d:green:voice";
gpios = <&gpio0 5 1>;
};
};