ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
This commit is contained in:
@@ -91,12 +91,12 @@
|
||||
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
||||
|
||||
system {
|
||||
label = "kingston:blue:system";
|
||||
label = "mlw221:blue:system";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio2 3 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
wifi {
|
||||
label = "kingston:blue:wifi";
|
||||
label = "mlw221:blue:wifi";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio3 0 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user